Multi-TSA Portfolio
Bring the same board reporting discipline to every deal. Portfolio retainer.
Fixed-fee proposal in 48 hours. Senior team on day one. The first conversation is always free.
Operating partner TSA board reporting keeps the carve-out narrative visible at the deal partner level and the investment committee level for the full TSA period. The reporting cadence is set in the operating partner playbook and follows the same one page scorecard every meeting. Board reports that change format month to month invite drift. Board reports that hold to a fixed template force the conversation back to the same questions: cost, timeline, value creation moves, risks. That repetition is what keeps the TSA visible through close, mid, and exit.
Boards that lose visibility into the TSA tend to underinvest in the program. The deal closes, the operating partner gives a quick TSA update at the next meeting, and the topic gradually moves down the agenda. Six months later, the board is surprised to learn that exit is slipping, the cost is running ten percent over plan, and the value creation moves have not started.
Board reporting on the TSA prevents this drift by holding the topic in front of the deal partner, the investment committee, and the rest of the board for the duration of the program. The reporting forces a monthly discipline: produce the scorecard, surface the issues, recommend the actions. The discipline keeps both the Newco team and the operating partner accountable.
Board reporting also creates a record. Eighteen months after close, when the TSA finally exits and the value creation results show up in the operating model, the board has a paper trail showing how it happened. The reporting is also the basis for the value creation case in any future capital event.
The work pairs with operating partner portfolio TSA rhythm, which feeds the board scorecard from the underlying monthly review.
The TSA board scorecard fits on one page. The fields are fixed across every board meeting for the duration of the TSA. The format does not change. The colors are green, yellow, red with one sentence of supporting commentary. The point of the format is to make pattern recognition possible across consecutive board meetings.
The top block shows the TSA at a glance. Total TSA fee year to date, percent of budget consumed, projected total spend through exit. Exit date currently forecast versus original target. Number of workstreams green, yellow, red.
The middle block shows the value creation moves. The six to eight value creation initiatives identified at close, each with a target savings number and a current progress color. Cost takeout from TSA descope. Vendor renegotiation. Application portfolio rationalization. Organization design. Real estate exit. Banking consolidation.
The bottom block shows the operating partner actions. Issues that need board attention or deal partner intervention. Decisions requested from the investment committee. Resourcing asks. The block is short, ideally two or three lines. The work pairs with operating partner value creation TSA.
The scorecard sits inside a three paragraph board narrative. The narrative is not optional. Numbers on a page without interpretation invite the board to draw its own conclusions, which are often wrong. The operating partner uses the narrative to frame the numbers correctly.
Paragraph one is current state. What changed this month. Where the program is versus plan. Which value creation moves landed and which slipped. The paragraph is factual and short. No celebrations, no excuses. Just what happened.
Paragraph two is the forward view. What the next thirty to sixty days will look like. Which workstreams approach milestones. Which value creation moves enter execution. Which seller decisions are pending. The forward view tells the board what to watch for and when to expect the next inflection.
Paragraph three is the operating partner ask. What does the board need to decide. What does the operating partner need from the deal team. The paragraph is direct. No board reading time is wasted on items where the operating partner is not actually asking for anything. The work pairs with operating partner TSA budget management.
The board scorecard format stays constant but the emphasis shifts across the TSA life cycle. In the Day One window, the emphasis is on stability. Did the cutover happen cleanly? Are employees, customers, and vendors stable? Are the TSA services performing? The cost and value creation blocks are placeholder until baseline is set.
In the early TSA window, months two through six, the emphasis is on cost takeout and value creation traction. Have the original assumptions about service catalog and pricing held? Have the early renegotiation campaigns landed? Is the application rationalization plan being executed? The scorecard makes the early wins visible to the board.
In the mid TSA window, months seven through the planned exit minus six, the emphasis is on exit readiness. Are the standalone capabilities being built on plan? Is the cutover plan tested? Are seller dependencies tracking down to zero? Is the exit milestone schedule realistic? The scorecard surfaces slippage early so the board can authorize acceleration if needed.
In the exit window, the last six months, the emphasis is on cutover execution. Each workstream exit, the technical cutover steps, the seller signoffs, the customer and vendor communications. The scorecard reads like a project plan. The work pairs with operating partner TSA exit planning.
The investment committee version of the TSA report compresses the deal level scorecard into a portfolio view. The investment committee sees one page per deal at the start, then a one page portfolio summary that stacks all active TSAs together. The summary shows total portfolio TSA cost, total exits expected in the next twelve months, and the deals where the operating partner is asking for intervention.
The investment committee report is also where the operating partner makes the case for TSA program resourcing. Buyer-side advisor portfolio retainer, specialist hires inside portfolio operations, capital deployed for cost takeout work. The case for resourcing reads better when the committee has been watching the same scorecard for months.
The investment committee also wants to see the cross deal patterns. Are the same sellers showing up across deals? Are the same vendors creating issues across deals? Are the same workstreams systematically running late? The pattern view drives portfolio level fixes rather than deal by deal firefighting.
The investment committee version typically runs quarterly, not monthly. The deal level scorecard runs monthly to the deal partner. The investment committee gets the rolled up view at its standard cadence. The work pairs with operating partner portfolio TSA rhythm.
The TSA board pack does not include the underlying invoice detail, the full service catalog, the workstream Gantt chart, or the line item budget. Those documents exist at the program level and are available on request. They do not belong in the board pack. Board reading time is finite and any minute the board spends reading detail is a minute it does not spend on the strategic questions.
The board pack also does not include vanity items. Long lists of completed tasks. Photos of the war room. Testimonials from happy users. The pack is operational, factual, and tightly scoped. Operating partners who fall into the trap of dressing up the board pack invite skepticism from the board.
The board pack stays the same length every month. One page scorecard. Three paragraph narrative. Two or three appendix pages if and only if the operating partner is making an ask that requires supporting detail. Otherwise the appendices stay closed.
The discipline of the format is the operating partner's signal to the rest of the board: this program is being run on a defined cadence, with defined metrics, and the operating partner is in control. The work pairs with TSA monthly operating rhythm.
For the full exit sequence behind these plays, start with the TSA exit strategy pillar. For the management team view, see how the firm works with portfolio companies.
The monthly, quarterly, and annual cadence for monitoring TSAs across a PE portfolio.
Read the article →How a well run TSA program becomes a value creation lever rather than a deal cleanup chore.
Read the article →How the operating partner sets, tracks, and defends the TSA budget across the carve-out period.
Read the article →The 90-day governance, IT, finance, HR and procurement separation plan we run on live carve-outs. Get the playbook plus the bi-weekly Day One Letter — short, signal-heavy, buyer-side.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click. · Read the overview first →
Fixed-fee proposal in 48 hours. Senior team on day one. The first conversation is always free.
Seven buyer-side moves to exit a Transition Services Agreement on time and below budget. The mark-up, the extension-fee curve, exit sequencing, and the 11-month calendar.
A representative $150M-revenue platform carve-out runs a Transition Services Agreement across nine functions. For a PE owner the exit is not an IT chore — it is a value-creation workstream with an EBITDA number on it. The moves below cut the exit from a 16-month drift to a 9-month managed exit, remove $4.4M of mark-up and stranded cost, and lift recurring EBITDA enough to move enterprise value at exit multiple.
One tactic, one benchmark, or one pattern from a recent buyer-side engagement. Short. Signal heavy. Free.
Subscribe to The Day One Letter →