Multi-TSA Portfolio
Run the same vendor strategy across every portfolio deal. Portfolio retainer.
Fixed-fee proposal in 48 hours. Senior team on day one. The first conversation is always free.
Operating partner TSA vendor management is the strategy and tracking work that gets Newco from a seller dependent vendor stack to a fully standalone vendor stack, with savings captured along the way. The work fits inside the broader operating partner playbook and runs alongside cost takeout and exit planning. Vendor management is not procurement. It is the operating partner judgment on which vendors to keep, which to replace, and which to use as cost takeout levers during the TSA period.
Every Newco inherits a vendor stack at Day One that falls into four buckets. The buckets are defined by two questions: does Newco have its own contract with the vendor, and is the vendor providing services Newco wants to keep. The buckets need different strategies and different operating partner attention.
Bucket one is keep and assign. Vendors where Newco wants the service and the contract is assignable to Newco from the seller. The strategy is to execute the assignment cleanly, then renegotiate terms once Newco is the customer of record. Bucket two is keep and rebuild. Vendors where Newco wants the service but the contract cannot transfer. The strategy is to negotiate a new Newco contract before TSA exit, often during phase two of exit planning.
Bucket three is replace. Vendors where Newco does not want the seller's choice. The strategy is to source a replacement vendor, build the integration, and migrate before TSA exit. Bucket four is retire. Vendors providing services Newco does not need at all. The strategy is to remove the cost line from the TSA service catalog during the cost takeout phase.
The bucket assignment happens in phase one of exit planning and gets refined throughout the TSA. The operating partner pressure tests the assignments because they drive the exit cost budget. The work pairs with operating partner TSA exit planning.
A typical Newco has hundreds of vendors. The operating partner cannot manage all of them. The work concentrates on the top twenty by spend, which usually represent eighty percent or more of the total third-party cost. The remaining vendors run through the standard Newco procurement process.
The top twenty list is dynamic. Some vendors are at the top because of legacy spend that will go away. Others are at the top because they represent strategic capability. The operating partner reviews the list quarterly and reorganizes the priorities. The buyer-side advisor maintains the list and supports the negotiation work on the highest priority vendors.
Each top twenty vendor gets a status: current contract terms, renewal date, Newco strategy (keep and assign, keep and rebuild, replace, retire), negotiation owner, target savings. The list rolls up into the monthly scorecard so the operating partner can see vendor management progress against plan.
Categories that often appear on the top twenty list include cloud infrastructure, enterprise software, telecommunications, professional services, logistics, and benefits providers. Each category has different negotiation dynamics. The work pairs with TSA vendor management.
Most carve-out TSAs depend on third-party vendor consents that have not been secured at signing. The seller's contracts often have change of control clauses, anti assignment clauses, or right of first refusal clauses that the vendor can invoke when the seller assigns the contract to Newco. The operating partner tracks the consent inventory closely because consent issues can disrupt Day One.
The seller is usually responsible for securing vendor consents pre close, but in practice the work often slips into the TSA period. The buyer-side advisor maintains a consent tracker showing which consents are required, which are confirmed, which are in negotiation, and which are at risk. The tracker is reviewed weekly during the pre Day One window and at least monthly thereafter.
Vendors occasionally use the consent moment to renegotiate terms. A cloud vendor seeing the change of control may demand a price increase or a longer commitment as a condition of consent. The operating partner authorizes the response: accept the new terms, escalate the negotiation, or replace the vendor. The decision needs to be quick because consent timelines are tight.
Failed consents become operating partner level escalations. A vendor that refuses to consent on acceptable terms either gets replaced (which may push out the TSA exit) or gets accommodated (which may inflate the exit cost). The work pairs with TSA third-party vendor consents.
During the TSA period, most third-party vendor costs pass through from seller to Newco on a cost-plus basis. The seller invoices the vendor at its enterprise rate, applies a defined mark-up under the TSA, and bills Newco for the total. The pass-through mechanism is fertile ground for overcharges if the buyer is not auditing.
Common pass-through issues include incorrect volume allocations, seller mark-ups applied above the TSA cap, license costs allocated based on enterprise scale rather than Newco scale, and renewals priced at higher rates than the underlying vendor agreement supports. The buyer-side advisor audits a sample of pass-through invoices each quarter to surface these patterns.
Pass-through audits routinely identify savings of five to fifteen percent on the audited categories. The operating partner authorizes the audit work as part of the standard portfolio retainer scope. The savings recovered, combined with the avoided future overcharges from corrected allocations, often pay for the retainer multiple times over.
Pass-through pricing also creates a strategic question. Some vendors charge Newco less under the seller's enterprise rate than Newco could negotiate on its own. In those cases, accelerating the exit to a Newco standalone contract may increase cost. The operating partner weighs the cost effect against the optionality benefit of clean exit. The work pairs with TSA vendor cost pass-through audit.
Once Newco becomes the contract holder, the vendor renegotiation campaigns start. The campaigns target specific savings on specific vendors, with planned timing and resourcing. The operating partner approves the campaign portfolio and tracks results on the monthly scorecard.
Campaign sequencing matters. Cloud infrastructure usually goes first because it is a large spend with frequent renewal cycles. Enterprise software comes second because it tends to have annual renewal cycles that align with the campaign timing. Telecommunications and professional services round out the early waves. Lower priority categories follow.
Each campaign has a budget for sourcing advisor support, a target savings number, and a known timing. Campaigns that miss the target trigger an operating partner review. Did the vendor refuse the requested terms? Did the Newco team miss a deadline? Did the original target assume too much? The review drives the next move: renegotiate, replace, or accept the current terms.
The renegotiation campaigns also build muscle. The Newco procurement team gets practice running negotiations at Newco scale rather than enterprise scale. The capability lasts beyond the TSA period and pays back across future contract cycles. The work pairs with operating partner TSA cost takeout.
The TSA period also builds the standalone procurement function inside Newco. Most carve-outs inherit a procurement capability that was scaled for the seller's enterprise. The Newco needs a smaller, more focused team that can run the renegotiation campaigns, manage vendor performance, and source replacements when needed.
The operating partner approves the standalone procurement design as part of the broader organization design work. The design names the head of procurement, the category specialists, the contract management capability, and the source to pay process. The buyer-side advisor often fills the category specialist role during the TSA period before the standalone hires arrive.
The standalone procurement function should be operational by exit. The operating partner verifies readiness through the standard go no go criteria: standing process documented, key hires made, contract repository established, vendor performance management running. Procurement functions that are not ready at exit create immediate cost leakage post exit.
After exit, the Newco procurement team owns the vendor management work end. The operating partner stays engaged on the top five vendor decisions but otherwise lets the Newco run its own procurement function. The work pairs with carve-out procurement strategy.
For the full exit sequence behind these plays, start with the TSA exit strategy pillar. For the management team view, see how the firm works with portfolio companies.
The specific cost takeout moves an operating partner runs during the TSA period to capture savings before exit.
Read the article →The milestones and decisions that protect on time TSA exit across a PE portfolio.
Read the article →How the operating partner sets, tracks, and defends the TSA budget across the carve-out period.
Read the article →The 90-day governance, IT, finance, HR and procurement separation plan we run on live carve-outs. Get the playbook plus the bi-weekly Day One Letter — short, signal-heavy, buyer-side.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click. · Read the overview first →
Fixed-fee proposal in 48 hours. Senior team on day one. The first conversation is always free.
Seven buyer-side moves to exit a Transition Services Agreement on time and below budget. The mark-up, the extension-fee curve, exit sequencing, and the 11-month calendar.
A representative $150M-revenue platform carve-out runs a Transition Services Agreement across nine functions. For a PE owner the exit is not an IT chore — it is a value-creation workstream with an EBITDA number on it. The moves below cut the exit from a 16-month drift to a 9-month managed exit, remove $4.4M of mark-up and stranded cost, and lift recurring EBITDA enough to move enterprise value at exit multiple.
One tactic, one benchmark, or one pattern from a recent buyer-side engagement. Short. Signal heavy. Free.
Subscribe to The Day One Letter →